A lawyer for Bawku Naba, Maxwell Agbambilla has described the enskinment of the chief by the Nayiri as modern-day slavery.
The legal practitioner explained that it was unacceptable for a group of people to be forced to accept a ruler who is enskinned by a group with whom they do not speak the same language.
“Is it his case that today, if the Zebilla … skin is vacant, the Zebilla chief should go to Bawku with an interpreter to be enskinned as a Bawku Naba, and he doesn’t see that that is colonialism or apartheid?
“…How is it that in this present-day democracy, that I should be forced to go to somebody, whose language I do not speak to be enskinned as a chief and to be controlled and ordered about by him?” he stressed.
Speaking on Newsfile on Saturday, Mr Agbambilla asserted that it was unlawful and an offence for someone to be enskinned as the chief of a town to which they did not belong.
He emphasised that should the occurrence above occur, there may be a chance for conflict between the two ethnic groups.
“There’s an offence called breaches of the chiefs. If I get up and go to Kumasi because there’s a Kusasi community in Kumasi, I mass up my people, get people to come to Bawku and say I am going to be the Ashantehene knowing fully well that what I am going to do is likely going to provoke Ashantis to react, is that not criminal”, he said.
Mr Agbambilla’s statement was in response to the Mamprusi representative on the Bawku Inter-ethnic Peace Committee, Mohammed Tahiru Nambe, who had earlier approved the enskinment of the new Bawku Naba as legitimate.
Mr Nambe further said that Bawku was a Mamprusis community and that the Nayiri’s enskinning a new chief was simply the Nayiri exercising his authority.
However, Mr Agbambilla disagreed with the Mamprusi representative’s assertion and contended that Mr Nambe’s tale reflected colonialism and apartheid.
The lawyer for Bawku Naba, therefore, insisted that “As far as we are concerned as Kusasis, we are not willing to go to anybody with an interpreter to be enskinned.”
<img src="https://www.mtlblog.com/media-library/shelves-at-a-canadian-grocery-store.jpg?id=61429794&width=1245&height=700&coordinates=45%2C0%2C45%2C0"/><br/><br/><p>Back in February, <a href="https://www.mtlblog.com/quebec-tourism-ad-american" target="_blank">tensions between Canada and the United States</a> escalated after President Donald Trump announced <a href="https://www.narcity.com/trump-tariffs-canada-how-might-impact-you" target="_blank">steep tariffs on Canadian imports</a>. Framed as a national security issue by the White House, the move was seen as a slap in the face to one of America's closest allies.</p><p>Almost overnight, a grassroots boycott movement emerged across Canada. Shoppers pledged to avoid U.S. products, travel, and chains, and social media lit up with calls to "buy Canadian" in protest. Even small actions, like <a href="https://www.mtlblog.com/made-in-canada-grocery-items" target="_blank">skipping American-made ketchup</a> or <a href="https://www.mtlblog.com/montreal-airport-us-travel-canada" target="_blank">cancelling cross-border trips</a>, became political statements.</p><p>Now, nearly half a year later, the North American trade war is still on, and maple leaves on labels are a regular part of the grocery shopping experience. With that in mind, we recently asked MTL Blog readers if they're <em>still</em> boycotting the U.S. — and how. The answers were varied, thoughtful, and in some cases, downright surprising. </p><p>Here are some of the top responses from the <a href="https://www.facebook.com/MTLBlog/posts/are-canadians-still-boycotting-the-usa/1205029894998252/" target="_blank">Facebook post</a>, which has amassed over 5,000 replies. </p><h3>Yes</h3><br/><p>For most of the readers who responded to the post, the boycott is alive and well. One user, firm in their resolve, shared that they're "100% not going [to the U.S.] for at least 3 1/2 more years," adding that they regularly check labels to buy Canadian whenever possible.</p><p>Another reader said they've made a point to cut ties across the board: "Vacation, food, booze — I make a deliberate effort to choose away from US."</p><p>Someone who recently travelled across the border noted the drop in traffic, remarking that "there wasn't a single car in the line at the border," and took that as evidence that the boycott is working.</p><p>For others, though, the decision plays out in smaller, everyday moments, like putting down a tempting snack. One user recounted spotting "beautiful looking green grapes on sale" only to place them back on the shelf after discovering they were grown in the U.S. "Couldn't do it," they wrote. "Put them back and went without."</p><p>Another commenter drew a firm line: "All my food produce has to be Canada first, Mexico second, and any other countries but the US."</p><p>Plenty of folks said opting for local goods has been easy, since Canadian products are of "better quality."</p><p>The boycott has shaped the vacation plans of Canadians, too. "I'm sitting here in Cuba because I'll never go to America again," said one user.</p><p>Others made it clear this isn't a new lifestyle, just a strengthened one. "I was buying only Canadian before the trade war hit," wrote a long-time supporter of local goods. "This trade war made me confirm even more that buying only Canadian is and was a proper thing to do."</p><h3>Yes, but only as long as Trump is in charge</h3><br/><p>A common thread among many responses was that their boycott wasn't about the U.S. as a whole, but specifically about its current leadership.</p><p>"Is Trump still president? There's your answer," wrote one reader.</p><p>"As long as Trump is the head of state," said another, "I'm out."</p><p>Others echoed that they're sticking to the boycott "until Trump leaves," suggesting their protest is less about trade and more about politics.</p><p>"Will miss going to the States, but will stay home as long as that bully is in charge," one comment read.</p><p>The Trump administration's <a href="https://www.mtlblog.com/canada-border-travel-advisory-us" target="_blank">enhanced border security measures</a>, which include possible searches of electronic devices like phones and laptops, also seem to be playing a part, with one commenter saying they'd "rather not take the chance of unlawful detainment, among other things."</p><p>One user even took it as far as revealing that their future travel plans could be shaped by the next administration: "I will not go to the US until Trump is gone. And then I will have to decide if I will go, depending upon who replaces Trump."</p><h3>It depends</h3><br/><p>Several readers took a more nuanced approach, saying they will head south of the border. As for their shopping habits, decisions often come down to context. "If the Canadian option is low quality, I'm going to pay more for quality than buy a cheap product that needs to be replaced sooner" one reader explained.</p><p>Another pointed out that "if the product is made in the USA, I won't buy it," but added that if it’s "a U.S. company but made and produced in Canada, then yes, I buy."</p><h3>No</h3><br/><p>Of course, not everyone jumped on the boycott bandwagon. Some admitted they never saw the point. "Nope… never did," one person put it simply.</p><p>A few felt the whole idea missed the mark. "Ordinary Americans deserve our support," one commenter wrote. "Local businesses and cross-border towns… they are welcome in Canada too."</p><p>For others, it mostly comes down to the price tag. "Whatever is better for me," said one practical shopper. "If local strawberries are $9 and American [ones] are $3, I'm buying American."</p><p>Another kept it short and sweet, revealing that they are simply "going with the cheapest."</p><p>And for one user, it was all about getting the most bang for their buck: "The combination of cheaper price and best quality products makes my wallet happier! I don't care [about the] product's nationality."</p>
Donald Trump announced Thursday that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. would be his nominee to lead the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), setting the stage for a potentially radical remaking of the nation’s health care. Kennedy’s nomination was not a surprise. Last month, Kennedy said Trump had promised him control of the department and […]
THE NBA has postponed Wednesday night’s New Orleans Pelicans’ home game against the Milwaukee Bucks due to a historic snowstorm. Parts of Lousiana, including the…
