The far-right and euroskeptic Swiss People’s Party (SVP) is set to make its strongest showing ever in national elections, according to projections by the NZZ newspaper.
The SVP, which has centered its campaign on anti-immigrant rhetoric, is projected to win 30 percent of the vote, up from 25.6 percent four years ago and higher than pre-election polls. It has been the country’s largest party since 2003.
In an election dominated by domestic issues, the three other main parties — the Social Democrats, the Free Democrats and the Center Alliance — are also projected to make gains, with only the Greens and the Green Liberals projected to come out weaker than in 2019.
The Swiss vote for 200 seats in the lower chamber of parliament, the National Council, and 46 seats in the upper chamber, the Council of States. Since 1959, all the major parties have been represented in the seven-member government — the Federal Council — which is elected by members of parliament.
The final results will be announced at 6 p.m. on Sunday.
The EU will ramp up its rhetoric against Moscow when finance ministers travel to Washington for international meetings next week, according to draft statements seen…
<img src="https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-loaded/v1/-wn1B6S3GxYRFlX8Wo9Dlnn9ye8UNv30" border=0 width="1" height="1" alt="The Future of SCOTUSblog" title="The Future of SCOTUSblog"> <p>Dear SCOTUSblog readers,</p> <p>As one era ends, an exciting new one begins.</p> <p>SCOTUSblog is delighted to announce that it has been acquired by Dispatch Media, Inc., and will round out <em>The Dispatch</em>’s coverage of the Supreme Court and the rule of law.</p> <p>This blog began nearly a quarter of a century ago as a way to promote our legal work. Over the years, it has evolved into a resource on all things related to the Supreme Court, from soup-to-nuts coverage of the cases argued at the court to retirements, confirmations, and other special features. We have scaled back our coverage in recent years as the costs of that coverage grew, but through our partnership with <em>The Dispatch</em>, we will be able to restore SCOTUSblog’s publishing capabilities, including expanded analysis for all merits cases and oral arguments.</p> <span id="more-505369"></span> <p><em>The Dispatch</em> plans to maintain SCOTUSblog as our users have come to enjoy it and will continue to offer its existing content to all readers at no cost — while bringing back some of the site’s most beloved features, such as the Stat Pack. The site will also continue to remain a source of unbiased coverage of the Supreme Court.</p> <p>Historically, SCOTUSblog content was published under a Creative Commons license allowing non-commercial use. That license remains in effect for past content, and those uses will continue to be honored. Going forward, however, all SCOTUSblog content falls under <em>The Dispatch</em>’s copyright. Any future use will require permission from <em>The Dispatch</em>. If you’re interested in licensing our content for research, educational, or commercial use, we’re open to those conversations. Please reach out to scotusblog@thedispatch.com.</p> <p>With the Supreme Court now in the home stretch of yet another consequential term, it’s a wonderful time to be joining <em>The Dispatch</em> family. Michael Rothman, the president of <em>The Dispatch</em>, has said that the company hopes to become “the definitive source for legal news and analysis in the United States.” We are thrilled to be part of that effort and grateful for <em>The Dispatch</em>’s faith in SCOTUSblog. </p> <p>We are also grateful to you, our readers. Thank you for joining us over the years, and we look forward to continuing to write for you for many more.</p> <p>—Amy</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/04/the-future-of-scotusblog/">The Future of SCOTUSblog</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com">SCOTUSblog</a>.</p>
<p><img width="150" height="150" src="https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Banner201130-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="The morning read for Tuesday, August 6" title="The morning read for Tuesday, August 6" style="float:right;" decoding="async" />Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Tuesday morning read: US Supreme Court’s Clarence Thomas took more undisclosed travel funded by billionaire, senator says (John Kruzel, Reuters) Supreme Court nixes...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/08/the-morning-read-for-tuesday-august-6/">The morning read for Tuesday, August 6</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com">SCOTUSblog</a>.</p>