This week, Jack and Sam discuss why defense and security — both domestic and foreign – will be a big focus as they look at reaction to Friday’s terror attack in Russia and claims that China has been behind cyber attacks targeting MPs and peers, threatening British democracy.
Plus, there’s Rishi Sunak’s final appearance before the Easter break as he faces questions from the liaison committee on topics including global issues, the economy and public services.
Dutch prosecutors on Tuesday demanded 12 years in prison for a Pakistani ex-cricketer, who is accused of offering around €21,000 for someone to assassinate the…
A focus on climate change will no longer be amongst the responsibilities of any of Lancashire County Council’s cabinet after the new Reform administration took control of the authority. New […]
<p><img width="150" height="150" src="https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/supreme-court2-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Special Counsel Jack Smith revises indictment against Trump" title="Special Counsel Jack Smith revises indictment against Trump" style="float:right;" decoding="async" srcset="https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/supreme-court2-150x150.jpg 150w, https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/supreme-court2-570x570.jpg 570w, https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/supreme-court2-500x500.jpg 500w, https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/supreme-court2-1000x1000.jpg 1000w" sizes="(max-width: 150px) 100vw, 150px" />Just under two months after a divided Supreme Court ruled that former presidents have broad immunity from prosecution for their conduct in office, Special Counsel Jack Smith charged former President Donald Trump in a revised indictment alleging that Trump conspired to overturn the results of...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/08/special-counsel-jack-smith-revises-indictment-against-trump/">Special Counsel Jack Smith revises indictment against Trump</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com">SCOTUSblog</a>.</p>