Sky News’ deputy political editor Sam Coates and Politico’s Jack Blanchard with their guide to the election day ahead.
This is day 29 of the campaign. Jack and Sam discuss all four main leaders facing an audience on primetime TV, who is missing from the Tories’ party donors event, Bank of England interest rates and who the newspapers are going to endorse for No 10.
<p>Lawyer Maxwell Okpara says Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan’s petition against Senate President Akpabio was struck out for procedural breaches, being “fundamentally defective”</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.arise.tv/maxwell-okpara-natashas-petition-against-akpabio-was-struck-out-because-it-was-fundamentally-defective/">Maxwell Okpara: Natasha’s Petition Against Akpabio Was Struck Out Because It Was ‘Fundamentally Defective’</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.arise.tv">Arise News</a>.</p>
<p>On Wednesday, June 18, we will be live blogging as the court releases opinions in one or more argued cases from the current term. Click here for a list of FAQs about […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/06/announcement-of-opinions-for-wednesday-june-18/">Announcement of opinions for Wednesday, June 18</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com">SCOTUSblog</a>.</p>
<p><img width="150" height="150" src="https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Picture1-e1742581102481-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="“We’re not there to provide entertainment. We’re there to decide cases,” Roberts sternly declared. Or did he? — ChatGPT and the Supreme Court, two years later" title="“We’re not there to provide entertainment. We’re there to decide cases,” Roberts sternly declared. Or did he? — ChatGPT and the Supreme Court, two years later" style="float:right;" decoding="async" srcset="https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Picture1-e1742581102481-150x150.jpg 150w, https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Picture1-e1742581102481-500x500.jpg 500w" sizes="(max-width: 150px) 100vw, 150px" />Just over two years ago, following the launch of ChatGPT, SCOTUSblog decided to test how accurate the much-hyped AI really was — at least when it came to Supreme Court-related questions. The conclusion? Its performance was “uninspiring”: precise, accurate, and at times surprisingly human-like text...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/03/were-not-there-to-provide-entertainment-were-there-to-decide-cases-roberts-sternly-declared-or-did-he-chatgpt-and-the-supreme-court-two-years-later/">“We’re not there to provide entertainment. We’re there to decide cases,” Roberts sternly declared. Or did he? — ChatGPT and the Supreme Court, two years later</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com">SCOTUSblog</a>.</p>
