In a win for Tennessee’s Republican-led legislature, a federal appeals court on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit brought by an LGBTQ group that challenged a state law restricting drag shows considered “harmful to minors.”
Friends of George’s, a Memphis-based theater that does “drag-centric performances,” sued over the law last year, claiming it would hurt its business because it has no age restrictions.
The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday ruled that Friends of George’s didn’t have legal standing to sue over the law because it wasn’t at risk of violating the law, finding its shows weren’t “harmful to minors.”
The ruling reverses a lower court decision that called the law unconstitutional after the group sued, temporarily blocking its enforcement in Memphis’ Shelby County. The lower court had called the law “substantially overbroad” and said it encouraged “discriminatory enforcement.”
With the support of Republican Gov. Bill Lee, the first-of-its-kind law was passed by the state legislature last year but has faced legal hurdles since then.
“Harmful to minors” has been defined by the Tennessee Supreme Court as shows that lack “serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for a reasonable 17-year-old minor.”
In its ruling Thursday, the appeals court said Friends of George’s “has not alleged that its performances lack serious value for a 17-year-old. In fact, it insists the exact opposite. Its own witness, a member of FOG’s board, conceded that its shows ‘are definitely appropriate’ for a 15-year-old and would ‘absolutely’ have artistic value for a 17-year-old.”
But state Rep. Aftyn Behn, a Democrat, claimed Thursday’s ruling was a “misguided attack on the LGBTQ+ community.”
“This isn’t about protecting kids; it’s about spreading fear and division,” she said. “It’s ironic that those who claim to support small government are the first to impose it on our personal freedoms.”
Fox News Digital has reached out to Friends of George’s for comment.
Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti argued, however, the law was “constitutionally sound.”
“As a state overflowing with world-class artists and musicians, Tennessee respects the right to free expression,” he said in a statement. “But as the court noted, Tennessee’s ‘harmful to minors’ standard is constitutionally sound, and Tennessee can absolutely prohibit the exhibition of obscene material to children.”
<img src="https://www.mtlblog.com/media-library/shelves-at-a-canadian-grocery-store.jpg?id=61429794&width=1245&height=700&coordinates=45%2C0%2C45%2C0"/><br/><br/><p>Back in February, <a href="https://www.mtlblog.com/quebec-tourism-ad-american" target="_blank">tensions between Canada and the United States</a> escalated after President Donald Trump announced <a href="https://www.narcity.com/trump-tariffs-canada-how-might-impact-you" target="_blank">steep tariffs on Canadian imports</a>. Framed as a national security issue by the White House, the move was seen as a slap in the face to one of America's closest allies.</p><p>Almost overnight, a grassroots boycott movement emerged across Canada. Shoppers pledged to avoid U.S. products, travel, and chains, and social media lit up with calls to "buy Canadian" in protest. Even small actions, like <a href="https://www.mtlblog.com/made-in-canada-grocery-items" target="_blank">skipping American-made ketchup</a> or <a href="https://www.mtlblog.com/montreal-airport-us-travel-canada" target="_blank">cancelling cross-border trips</a>, became political statements.</p><p>Now, nearly half a year later, the North American trade war is still on, and maple leaves on labels are a regular part of the grocery shopping experience. With that in mind, we recently asked MTL Blog readers if they're <em>still</em> boycotting the U.S. — and how. The answers were varied, thoughtful, and in some cases, downright surprising. </p><p>Here are some of the top responses from the <a href="https://www.facebook.com/MTLBlog/posts/are-canadians-still-boycotting-the-usa/1205029894998252/" target="_blank">Facebook post</a>, which has amassed over 5,000 replies. </p><h3>Yes</h3><br/><p>For most of the readers who responded to the post, the boycott is alive and well. One user, firm in their resolve, shared that they're "100% not going [to the U.S.] for at least 3 1/2 more years," adding that they regularly check labels to buy Canadian whenever possible.</p><p>Another reader said they've made a point to cut ties across the board: "Vacation, food, booze — I make a deliberate effort to choose away from US."</p><p>Someone who recently travelled across the border noted the drop in traffic, remarking that "there wasn't a single car in the line at the border," and took that as evidence that the boycott is working.</p><p>For others, though, the decision plays out in smaller, everyday moments, like putting down a tempting snack. One user recounted spotting "beautiful looking green grapes on sale" only to place them back on the shelf after discovering they were grown in the U.S. "Couldn't do it," they wrote. "Put them back and went without."</p><p>Another commenter drew a firm line: "All my food produce has to be Canada first, Mexico second, and any other countries but the US."</p><p>Plenty of folks said opting for local goods has been easy, since Canadian products are of "better quality."</p><p>The boycott has shaped the vacation plans of Canadians, too. "I'm sitting here in Cuba because I'll never go to America again," said one user.</p><p>Others made it clear this isn't a new lifestyle, just a strengthened one. "I was buying only Canadian before the trade war hit," wrote a long-time supporter of local goods. "This trade war made me confirm even more that buying only Canadian is and was a proper thing to do."</p><h3>Yes, but only as long as Trump is in charge</h3><br/><p>A common thread among many responses was that their boycott wasn't about the U.S. as a whole, but specifically about its current leadership.</p><p>"Is Trump still president? There's your answer," wrote one reader.</p><p>"As long as Trump is the head of state," said another, "I'm out."</p><p>Others echoed that they're sticking to the boycott "until Trump leaves," suggesting their protest is less about trade and more about politics.</p><p>"Will miss going to the States, but will stay home as long as that bully is in charge," one comment read.</p><p>The Trump administration's <a href="https://www.mtlblog.com/canada-border-travel-advisory-us" target="_blank">enhanced border security measures</a>, which include possible searches of electronic devices like phones and laptops, also seem to be playing a part, with one commenter saying they'd "rather not take the chance of unlawful detainment, among other things."</p><p>One user even took it as far as revealing that their future travel plans could be shaped by the next administration: "I will not go to the US until Trump is gone. And then I will have to decide if I will go, depending upon who replaces Trump."</p><h3>It depends</h3><br/><p>Several readers took a more nuanced approach, saying they will head south of the border. As for their shopping habits, decisions often come down to context. "If the Canadian option is low quality, I'm going to pay more for quality than buy a cheap product that needs to be replaced sooner" one reader explained.</p><p>Another pointed out that "if the product is made in the USA, I won't buy it," but added that if it’s "a U.S. company but made and produced in Canada, then yes, I buy."</p><h3>No</h3><br/><p>Of course, not everyone jumped on the boycott bandwagon. Some admitted they never saw the point. "Nope… never did," one person put it simply.</p><p>A few felt the whole idea missed the mark. "Ordinary Americans deserve our support," one commenter wrote. "Local businesses and cross-border towns… they are welcome in Canada too."</p><p>For others, it mostly comes down to the price tag. "Whatever is better for me," said one practical shopper. "If local strawberries are $9 and American [ones] are $3, I'm buying American."</p><p>Another kept it short and sweet, revealing that they are simply "going with the cheapest."</p><p>And for one user, it was all about getting the most bang for their buck: "The combination of cheaper price and best quality products makes my wallet happier! I don't care [about the] product's nationality."</p>
Two airplanes appeared to come too close to one another near an airport in Syracuse, New York, prompting the FAA to launch an investigation into the incident.
