Posted by 
The court will begin the December session this morning with oral arguments in FDA v. Wages and White Lion Investments, LLC and U.S. v. Miller. The first case is a dispute over the FDA’s 2021 rejection of two companies’ applications to sell fruit and candy flavored vape liquids, which the agency said are a risk to youth. The justices will then consider a case on whether a payment to the IRS shortly before a debtor files for bankruptcy must be returned.
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Monday morning read:
- Supreme Court hears fight over FDA’s refusal to approve flavored vapes (Lawrence Hurley, NBC News)
- Teen vaping hits a decade-low. Could Supreme Court review of flavored vapes reverse this? (Maureen Groppe, USA Today)
- First transgender attorney to argue before the Supreme Court, challenging health care ban for minors (Lindsay Whitehurst, The Associated Press)
- How a Supreme Court case on vaping could affect the FDA (David Ovalle & McKenzie Beard, The Washington Post)
- Ex parte Milligan and the Limits of Martial Law (Steve Vladeck, One First)
The post The morning read for Monday, Dec. 2 appeared first on SCOTUSblog.
