A Venezuelan navy patrol boat escorts Panamanian flagged crude oil tanker Yoselin near the El Palito refinery in Puerto Cabello, Venezuela on November 11, 2025. | Juan Carlos Hernandez/AFP via Getty Images
Following this week’s seizure of a sanctioned ship off the coast of Venezuela, the Trump administration says it will be targeting more oil tankers off the Venezuelan coast. This is, first and foremost, a dramatic escalation in the Trump administration’s campaign targeting Venezuela’s President Nicolás Maduro, whom the White House accuses of facilitating drug trafficking into the United States.
But it’s also the latest salvo in a campaign by Western governments to crack down on the so-called shadow fleet that has allowed countries like Venezuela, Russia, and Iran to continue participating in the global oil trade, despite international sanctions. In the past few days, there’s been yet another major escalation in this campaign, off the coast of Ukraine.
As Vox reported last year, the shadow fleet has been operating for years. Shadow fleet vessels tend to have opaque ownership; the nominal owner is often little more than a PO Box in the Seychelles or Dubai. The ships operate without standard insurance, are often older and less well-maintained than their above-board counterparts, and frequently manipulate their transponders and navigation system to avoid detection. They frequently change names and what country’s flag they sail under.
Case in point, the vessel seized by the US this week was sailing under the name Skipper and the flag of Guyana — but it had been sanctioned by the Biden administration in 2022 when it was known as the Adisa and flew the flag of Panama. As the Washington Post reported, the ship allegedly made several trips in and out of Iran last year along with stops in China and Syria, but it frequently turned off its data location transmission to prevent tracking. It had been operating off the coast of Venezuela since October, but had electronically masked its location, so it appeared to be off the coast of Guyana.
According to analysts quoted by Reuters, the Skipper was loaded with oil in Venezuela at the beginning of December and had transferred some of it to another tanker bound for Cuba shortly before it was seized. Cuba has been dependent for years on oil exports from its ideological ally Venezuela. While Cuba long relied on its own tankers for this trade, lack of maintenance has forced it to rely on the shadow fleet. Crumbling infrastructure and sanctions have taken a toll on Cuba’s energy system, and blackouts have become common. For the United States, increasing the pressure on Cuba’s economy could be seen as an added bonus of targeting the shadow fleet.
Globally, the issue has taken on a much greater prominence since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, which triggered a range of international sanctions meant to deprive the Kremlin of energy revenue. As Atlantic Council senior fellow Elisabeth Braw told Vox, Venezuela and Iran were long the main players in the shadow fleet, but “Russia’s involvement was a sort of quantum leap that brought this economy out of the shadows.” By some estimates, shadow vessels now account for around 20 percent of the entire global oil fleet — essentially a parallel global energy market.
Officials and analysts have been concerned about the shadow fleet not only because it provides an economic lifeline to these regimes, but also because of the risk that one of these decrepit, poorly maintained ships could be involved in an environmentally devastating spill, and that there would be no insurance company or accountable owner to clean it up.
As Slate’s Fred Kaplan notes, while the Trump administration has portrayed the Skipper seizure as part of its pressure campaign against Venezuela, it’s the sort of action you could imagine being taken by any administration. (The ship was originally sanctioned by Biden, after all.) It’s also notable in that the seizure was carried out by a law enforcement agency — the Coast Guard — in accordance with a seizure warrant. That differs from the recent strikes on alleged drug boats that were carried out by the military with virtually no legal authorization.
The Caribbean is also not the only place where the shadow fleet has come under attack in recent days. In the past two weeks, Ukrainian forces have struck five shadow fleet tankers carrying Russian oil: three in the Black Sea near the Ukrainian coast, one near Turkey, and one off the west coast of Africa.
This marks a shift in strategy for the Ukrainians, who have avoided hitting Russian commercial ships in recent years. Russia and Ukraine have been operating under an effective truce in strikes on Black Sea shipping since the early days of the war. The new attacks are a high-risk strategy, since they could lead to Russia retaliating against Ukrainian ships. The shift may be a sign of increasing desperation for the Ukrainians, who have been steadily losing territory to Russia on land and are under pressure from the Trump administration to sign a ceasefire that would likely include significant concessions to Russia.
The shadow fleet strikes also show one of the contradictions of Trump’s approach to the war: Though he has been pressuring Ukraine to back down at the negotiating table, his administration has been far more permissive than Biden’s when it comes to Ukrainian attacks on Russia’s energy infrastructure. (There were fears under Biden that attacks like these could lead to a spike in oil prices.)
The timing of the US seizure in the Caribbean and the Ukrainian strikes in the Black Sea is almost certainly coincidental. This doesn’t appear to be a coordinated campaign. But both are reminders of the complex shadow economy that has sprung up in recent years in response to Washington’s increasing use of sanctions. And both may be a sign that much more aggressive measures are coming to crack down on that economy.
<img src="https://www.mtlblog.com/media-library/cheese-section-in-a-metro-grocery-store-illustrative.jpg?id=57145414&width=1200&height=400&coordinates=0%2C538%2C0%2C538"/><br/><br/><p>Quebecers, you might want to take a closer look at what's in your fridge and pantry this week — several everyday food items have <a href="https://www.mtlblog.com/health-canada-product-recall-amika-shampoo" target="_blank">recently been recalled</a>, including cheese, frozen meals and even basic kitchen staples like salt and pepper. </p><p>The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) has flagged multiple products due to serious concerns, ranging from undeclared allergens and foreign contaminants to potential exposure to pathogens like E. coli.</p><p>This latest batch of <a href="https://www.mtlblog.com/food-recalls-quebec-ritz-crackers-chicken-nuggets" target="_blank">food recalls in Quebec</a> includes a mix of frozen meals, sweet treats and pantry staples, including items from the Provigo and Maxi house label PC Blue Menu.</p><p>Some <a href="https://www.mtlblog.com/tag/product-recall" target="_blank">products were recalled</a> because they contain undeclared ingredients like peanuts, almonds and eggs — bad news for anyone with allergies — while others, like certain cheeses, have been recalled due to possible bacterial contamination. And if you're seasoning your meals with salt or pepper, you may want to check the label, as your grinder bottles might even contain bits of plastic.</p><p>From frozen foods to pantry staples, these recalls could impact households across the province. Here's everything you need to know about eight of the latest <a href="https://www.mtlblog.com/food-recalls-quebec-tuna-baby-food-chocolate" target="_blank">food recalls</a> in Quebec, why they're being pulled from store shelves and what you should do if you have any of them at home.<span></span></p><h3>Chicken tikka masala</h3><br/><img alt="PC Blue Menu Chicken Tikka Masala, 350 g." class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="0f7a424d20224a66de3784facae4243c" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="1e79e" loading="lazy" src="https://www.mtlblog.com/media-library/pc-blue-menu-chicken-tikka-masala-350-g.png?id=57140056&width=980"/><p><strong>Recalled product</strong>: PC Blue Menu Chicken Tikka Masala, 350 g — best before November 12, 2025</p><p><strong>Recall reason</strong>: Loblaw Companies Limited is recalling its house label PC Blue Menu Chicken Tikka Masala because it contains undeclared almond, which could be dangerous for anyone with a tree nut allergy. The affected 350-gram frozen meals were sold nationwide, including at Loblaw-banner stores in Quebec like Provigo and Maxi. So far, there have been no reported reactions, but if you have a nut allergy, it's best to check your freezer and avoid eating it. The CFIA advises consumers to return the product to the store for a refund or throw it out.</p><p><strong><strong>Published/updated</strong></strong>: March 11, 2025</p><p><a href="https://recalls-rappels.canada.ca/en/alert-recall/pc-blue-menu-brand-chicken-tikka-masala-recalled-due-undeclared-almond" target="_blank">PC Blue Menu recall notice</a></p><h3>Chocolate bars</h3><br/><img alt="\u200b8 Cakes Biscoff Latte chocolate bar." class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="895e10e335228fb06be7ff610785f5ab" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="1e4aa" loading="lazy" src="https://www.mtlblog.com/media-library/u200b8-cakes-biscoff-latte-chocolate-bar.jpg?id=57141817&width=980"/><p><strong>Recalled products</strong>:</p><ul><li>8 Cakes Dark Pistachio Knafeh</li><li>8 Cakes Biscoff Latte</li><li>8 Cakes Golden Baklava</li></ul><p><strong>Recall reason</strong>: 8 Cakes Bake Shoppe Ltd. is recalling several of its chocolate bars because they contain allergens that weren't properly listed on the label, including wheat, walnut, sesame, soy and milk. These treats were sold across Canada and online, and while no allergic reactions have been reported, they could pose a serious risk to anyone with allergies or intolerances. If you need to avoid these ingredients, do not eat them. The CFIA recommends throwing them out or returning them to the store where they were purchased.</p><p><strong><strong>Published/</strong>updated</strong>: March 6, 2025</p><p><a href="https://recalls-rappels.canada.ca/en/alert-recall/8-cakes-brand-chocolate-products-recalled-due-improperly-declared-wheat-walnut-sesame" target="_blank">8 Cakes recall notice</a></p><h3>Almond butter cups</h3><br/><img alt="Eatlove Organic Almond Butter Cup, 51 g." class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="71ecb09c3d5a05867196bd97abb34789" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="81149" loading="lazy" src="https://www.mtlblog.com/media-library/eatlove-organic-almond-butter-cup-51-g.png?id=56707601&width=980"/><p><strong>Recalled product</strong>: Eatlove Organic Almond Butter Cup, 51 g — best before "25MA29"</p><p><strong>Recall reason</strong>: Eatlove is pulling a batch of its Organic Almond Butter Cups off shelves because they contain undeclared peanut — which could be dangerous or even life-threatening for those with allergies. These sweet treats were sold across Canada, including online, and the issue came to light after a customer complaint. So far, there has been one reported allergic reaction. If you have a peanut allergy, don't take any chances — check your cupboards and get rid of any recalled packages or return them to the store for a refund.</p><p><strong>Published/updated</strong>: March 6, 2025</p><p><a href="https://recalls-rappels.canada.ca/en/alert-recall/eatlove-brand-organic-almond-butter-cup-recalled-due-undeclared-peanut" target="_blank">Eatlove recall notice</a></p><h3>Fish cakes</h3><br/><img alt="\u200bPackaging of the recalled Hansang-brand frozen fish cakes." class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="f65b2a59f0dec6250833660c1d7622cc" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="c786e" loading="lazy" src="https://www.mtlblog.com/media-library/u200bpackaging-of-the-recalled-hansang-brand-frozen-fish-cakes.jpg?id=56707664&width=980"/><p><strong>Recalled products</strong>:</p><ul><li>Hansang Assorted Fish Cake with Katsuobushi Soup Stock, 960 g</li><li>Hansang (Korean characters only) Frozen Fried Fish Cake, 328 g</li><li>Hansang (Korean characters only) Frozen Fried Fish Cake & Rice Cake, 404 g</li><li>Hansang (Korean characters only) Frozen Fried Fish Cake (Mala Flavour), 345 g</li></ul><p><strong>Recall reason</strong>: Seoul Trading Corp. and Lemond Food Corp. are recalling various Hansang-brand frozen fish cakes because they contain egg that isn't listed on the label. This could be dangerous for anyone with an egg allergy, and to make things trickier, some packages don't clearly show the brand name in English. The issue was discovered through CFIA testing, and while no allergic reactions have been reported so far, eating these fish cakes could lead to serious health risks. If you have an egg allergy, check your freezer and don't eat them — the CFIA advises returning them to the store or tossing them out. </p><p><strong><strong>Published/</strong>updated</strong>: March 1, 2025</p><p><a href="https://recalls-rappels.canada.ca/en/alert-recall/hansang-brand-frozen-fish-cakes-recalled-due-undeclared-egg" target="_blank">Hansang recall notice</a></p><h3>Ulker snacks</h3><br/><img alt="\u200bUlker Rulokat, 170 g." class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="326a78483d2107c3da50a3d30b132901" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="7f4c0" loading="lazy" src="https://www.mtlblog.com/media-library/u200bulker-rulokat-170-g.png?id=56707824&width=980"/><p><strong>Recalled products</strong>:</p><ul><li>Ulker Kekstra Mini (strawberry), 150 g</li><li>Ulker Biskrem cocoa, 300 g</li><li>Ulker Rulokat, 170 g</li></ul><p><strong>Recall reason</strong>: Gulbay Foods Inc. and Quantimpex Inc. are recalling various Ulker-brand snack products imported from Turkey because they contain undeclared egg, milk and wheat. These allergens could be dangerous for anyone with allergies or gluten-related disorders. The affected snacks were sold in Ontario and Quebec, including at Gulbay Turkish Bakery in Vaughan and Marché Istanbul in Montreal. This recall was sparked by one in another country, and while no allergic reactions have been reported in Canada, those with allergies or celiac disease should avoid these products. If you have any at home, return them to the store or throw them out.</p><p><strong><strong>Published/</strong>updated</strong>: February 27, 2025</p><p><a href="https://recalls-rappels.canada.ca/en/alert-recall/certain-ulker-brand-products-recalled-due-undeclared-egg-milk-and-wheat" target="_blank">Ulker recall notice</a></p><h3>Cheese</h3><br/><img alt="\u200bJean Perrin Morbier de Scey cheese." class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="c3e2e48ca83a5453a786a8bf9f39e9a0" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="3f4b9" loading="lazy" src="https://www.mtlblog.com/media-library/u200bjean-perrin-morbier-de-scey-cheese.png?id=56707835&width=980"/><p><strong>Recalled products</strong>:</p><ul><li>Jean Perrin Morbier de Scey (cheese), variable size (~7 kg) — Lot # 3511206/03/2025</li><li>Jean Perrin Raclette de Scey (cheese), variable size (~7 kg) — Lot # 3551110/03/2025</li><li>Unbranded Morbier de Scey (cheese), variable size</li><li>Unbranded Raclette de Scey (cheese), variable size</li></ul><p><strong>Recall reason</strong>: Certain lots of Jean Perrin-brand Morbier and Raclette cheeses are being recalled due to possible contamination with pathogenic E. coli. This recall expands on <a href="https://www.narcity.com/food-recalls-canada-ritz-crackers-cheese-baby-snacks#rebelltitem15" target="_blank">an earlier cheese recall</a> from the same brand and affects cheeses sold in Alberta, B.C., Manitoba and Quebec — though the CFIA notes they may have also made their way to other provinces. These cheeses were often repackaged and sold without their original labels, meaning they might not display the brand name, lot code or expiry date — if you aren't sure if the cheese in your fridge is affected, you can call the store where you bought it.</p><p>The CFIA warns that eating food contaminated with E. coli can cause serious illness, with symptoms like severe stomach cramps, diarrhea and vomiting. If you have any of these cheeses at home, don't eat them — return them to the store or throw them out.</p><p><strong><strong>Published/</strong>updated</strong>: February 22, 2025</p><p><a href="https://recalls-rappels.canada.ca/en/alert-recall/jean-perrin-brand-morbier-scey-and-raclette-scey-cheeses-recalled-due-possible" target="_blank">Jean Perrin recall notice</a></p><h3>Salt & pepper</h3><br/><img alt="\u200bCape Herb & Spice Extra Bold Black Pepper & Himalayan Pink Salt." class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="b5e808420ce5642a334e00a02205ce7b" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="5af76" loading="lazy" src="https://www.mtlblog.com/media-library/u200bcape-herb-spice-extra-bold-black-pepper-himalayan-pink-salt.jpg?id=56707875&width=980"/><p><strong>Recalled products</strong>:</p><ul><li>Cape Herb & Spice Rainbow Peppercorns, 175 g</li><li>Cape Herb & Spice Extra Bold Black Pepper, 180 g</li><li>Cape Herb & Spice Atlantic Sea Salt, 360 g</li><li>Cape Herb & Spice Himalayan Pink Salt, 390 g</li></ul><p><strong>Recall reason</strong>: Cape Herb & Spice is recalling several of its salt and pepper grinders because they may contain pieces of plastic. These products were sold nationwide, and while no injuries have been reported, accidentally consuming plastic could pose a choking hazard or cause internal injury — not to mention it's definitely not what you want in your seasoning. If you have any of these recalled spices in your kitchen, check the labels and follow the CFIA's advice to return them to the store or throw them out.</p><p><strong><strong>Published/</strong>updated</strong>: February 21, 2025</p><p><a href="https://recalls-rappels.canada.ca/en/alert-recall/cape-herb-spice-brand-rainbow-peppercorns-extra-bold-black-pepper-atlantic-sea-salt-0" target="_blank">Salt & pepper recall notice</a></p><h3>Beef jerky</h3><br/><img alt="\u200bSoo Curry Flavoured Beef Jerky, 85 g." class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="9eb3d74045ac93409051ab2db53ed174" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="449c3" loading="lazy" src="https://www.mtlblog.com/media-library/u200bsoo-curry-flavoured-beef-jerky-85-g.jpg?id=56707842&width=980"/><p><strong>Recalled products</strong>:</p><ul><li>Soo Curry Flavoured Beef Jerky, 85 g</li><li>Soo Satay Beef Jerky, 85 g</li><li>Soo Satay Beef Jerky, 170 g</li><li>Soo Satay Beef Jerky, 454 g</li></ul><p><strong>Recall reason</strong>: Soo Jerky Ltd. is recalling several types of its beef jerky because they contain mustard that isn't listed on the label. This could be dangerous for anyone with a mustard allergy. The affected products were sold in Alberta, B.C., Ontario and Quebec, though they may have also been available in other provinces. So far, no allergic reactions have been reported, but if you have a mustard allergy, check your snacks and don't eat these. The CFIA recommends returning them to the store or throwing them out.</p><p><strong><strong>Published/</strong>updated</strong>: February 21, 2025</p><p><a href="https://recalls-rappels.canada.ca/en/alert-recall/soo-brand-beef-jerky-recalled-due-undeclared-mustard" target="_blank">Jerky recall notice</a></p><p>Stay safe out there, Montreal!</p><p><em>This article's cover image was used for illustrative purposes only.</em></p><p><p><em>AI tools may have been used to support the creation or distribution of this content; however, it has been carefully edited and fact-checked by a member of MTL Blog's Editorial team. For more information on our use of AI, please visit our <a href="https://www.mtlblog.com/editorial-standards" target="_blank">Editorial Standards page</a>.</em></p></p>