Posted by 
Victoria Cross recipient Ben Roberts-Smith was "not an honest and reliable witness" who lied about his involvement in war crimes to gain financially from his now failed defamation cases against the media.
In a Federal Court judgment published today, Justice Anthony Besanko made damning findings against the former SAS corporal who had "motives to lie" about the events in Afghanistan.
"I find that (Roberts-Smith) was not an honest and reliable witness," the judge wrote.
READ MORE: Former SAS soldier Ben Roberts-Smith's defamation claims thrown out
During a 2009 raid on Easter Sunday on a compound codenamed Whiskey 108 in Uruzgan Province, Roberts-Smith machine-gunned an unarmed prisoner in the back, taking the man's prosthetic leg back to Australia to use as a beer drinking vessel.
Roberts-Smith also stood silent while a rookie soldier was ordered to execute an elderly Afghan prisoner so he could be "blooded".
Besanko called the former SAS corporal's denials of these incidents "highly improbable" after hearing from independent witnesses with no reason to be dishonest.
The same could not be said about Roberts-Smith, the judge said.
"The applicant has motives to lie, being a financial motive to support his claim for damages in these proceedings, a motive to restore his reputation which he contends has been destroyed by the publication of the articles and significantly, a motive to resist findings against him which may affect whether further action is taken against him."
READ MORE: Ben Roberts-Smith resigns from Seven after landmark defamation ruling
Besanko found one of the newspapers' central claims – that Roberts-Smith had kicked an unarmed and handcuffed man, Ali Jan, off a 10-metre cliff and then ensured he was shot – was true.
As evidence of his guilt, Roberts-Smith attempted to cover up the unlawful killing at Darwan in September, 2012 by removing Jan's handcuffs and planting a radio alongside his lifeless body before he was photographed.
Roberts-Smith then told fellow SAS soldiers who witnessed the incident to stick to an approved story that Jan was a spotter who they killed legitimately.
In accepting the newspapers' claims, Besanko also rejected Roberts-Smith's account of the incident, which was riddled with a "number of improbabilities".
In October, 2012 in the Chinartu district, Roberts-Smith also ordered another soldier to execute an unarmed Afghan prisoner being interrogated after his troop discovered a fake wall cavity filled with weapons, including rocket propelled grenades and warheads.
"Person 12 then gave instructions to an NDS-Wakunish soldier who then shot the Afghan male in circumstances amounting to murder. The applicant was complicit in and responsible for murder," Besanko said.
In his summary judgment delivered on Thursday, Justice Besanko dismissed the cases against The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald, The Canberra Times and three journalists over their reports published in 2018.
If you are a current or former ADF member, or a relative, and need counselling or support, you can contact the Defence All-Hours Support Line on 1800 628 036 or Open Arms on 1800 011 046.
Nine, the publisher of this website, is also the publisher of The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age.
