<p><img width="150" height="150" src="https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Banner211101-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Pete Patterson on statutory authority and so-called “ghost guns”" title="Pete Patterson on statutory authority and so-called “ghost guns”" style="float:right;" decoding="async" />In this video, Nate Mowry interviews Pete Patterson from Cooper & Kirk. Pete will be arguing on behalf of the challengers in Garland v. VanDerStok, who are seeking to invalidate a 2022 rule by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives that regulates so-called...</p> <p>The post <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/10/pete-patterson-on-statutory-authority-and-so-called-ghost-guns/">Pete Patterson on statutory authority and so-called “ghost guns”</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com">SCOTUSblog</a>.</p>
In this video, Nate Mowry interviews Pete Patterson from Cooper & Kirk. Pete will be arguing on behalf of the challengers in Garland v. VanDerStok, who are seeking to invalidate a 2022 rule by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives that regulates so-called “ghost guns.”
The post Pete Patterson on statutory authority and so-called “ghost guns” appeared first on SCOTUSblog.
