Category

Category: Politics

Politics

Trump asks Supreme Court to block order to return wrongly deported man to U.S.

<img src="https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-loaded/v1/AXDo7-tiasQk6Qq2rHg4LHn9ye8UNv30" border=0 width="1" height="1" alt="Trump asks Supreme Court to block order to return wrongly deported man to U.S." title="Trump asks Supreme Court to block order to return wrongly deported man to U.S."> <img width="150" height="150" src="https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/supremecourt-6-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Trump asks Supreme Court to block order to return wrongly deported man to U.S." title="Trump asks Supreme Court to block order to return wrongly deported man to U.S." style="float:right;" decoding="async" srcset="https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/supremecourt-6-150x150.jpg 150w, https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/supremecourt-6-570x570.jpg 570w, https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/supremecourt-6-500x500.jpg 500w, https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/supremecourt-6-1000x1000.jpg 1000w" sizes="(max-width: 150px) 100vw, 150px" /><p><a class="a2a_button_facebook" href="https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/facebook?linkurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scotusblog.com%2F2025%2F04%2Ftrump-asks-supreme-court-to-block-order-to-return-wrongly-deported-man-to-u-s%2F&linkname=Trump%20asks%20Supreme%20Court%20to%20block%20order%20to%20return%20wrongly%20deported%20man%20to%20U.S." title="Facebook" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_linkedin" href="https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/linkedin?linkurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scotusblog.com%2F2025%2F04%2Ftrump-asks-supreme-court-to-block-order-to-return-wrongly-deported-man-to-u-s%2F&linkname=Trump%20asks%20Supreme%20Court%20to%20block%20order%20to%20return%20wrongly%20deported%20man%20to%20U.S." title="LinkedIn" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_twitter" href="https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/twitter?linkurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scotusblog.com%2F2025%2F04%2Ftrump-asks-supreme-court-to-block-order-to-return-wrongly-deported-man-to-u-s%2F&linkname=Trump%20asks%20Supreme%20Court%20to%20block%20order%20to%20return%20wrongly%20deported%20man%20to%20U.S." title="Twitter" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_email" href="https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/email?linkurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scotusblog.com%2F2025%2F04%2Ftrump-asks-supreme-court-to-block-order-to-return-wrongly-deported-man-to-u-s%2F&linkname=Trump%20asks%20Supreme%20Court%20to%20block%20order%20to%20return%20wrongly%20deported%20man%20to%20U.S." title="Email" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_printfriendly" href="https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/printfriendly?linkurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scotusblog.com%2F2025%2F04%2Ftrump-asks-supreme-court-to-block-order-to-return-wrongly-deported-man-to-u-s%2F&linkname=Trump%20asks%20Supreme%20Court%20to%20block%20order%20to%20return%20wrongly%20deported%20man%20to%20U.S." title="PrintFriendly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_no_icon addtoany_share_save addtoany_share" href="https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scotusblog.com%2F2025%2F04%2Ftrump-asks-supreme-court-to-block-order-to-return-wrongly-deported-man-to-u-s%2F&title=Trump%20asks%20Supreme%20Court%20to%20block%20order%20to%20return%20wrongly%20deported%20man%20to%20U.S." data-a2a-url="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/04/trump-asks-supreme-court-to-block-order-to-return-wrongly-deported-man-to-u-s/" data-a2a-title="Trump asks Supreme Court to block order to return wrongly deported man to U.S.">Share</a></p><p>The Trump administration came to the Supreme Court on Monday morning, asking the justices to block an order by a federal judge in Maryland that instructed the federal government to return a Maryland man erroneously deported to El Salvador, where he is being held in a maximum-security mega-prison, to the United States by Monday evening.</p> <p>Shortly after the government came to the Supreme Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit denied the Department of Justice’s request to block the order. “The United States Government has no legal authority to snatch a person who is lawfully present in the United States off the street and remove him from the country without due process,” the unanimous 4th Circuit wrote.</p> <p>John Sauer, who was confirmed as the U.S. solicitor general last week, told the justices that U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis had “ordered unprecedented relief: dictating to the United States that it must not only negotiate with a foreign country to return an enemy alien on foreign soil, but also succeed by 11:59 p.m. tonight.” Sauer also asked the court to grant an administrative stay, which would freeze Xinis’s order long enough to give the justices time to consider his request.<span id="more-319509"></span></p> <p>Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia was born in El Salvador and came to this country as an undocumented immigrant. In 2019, an immigration judge granted him withholding of removal, which means that he is protected against being removed to El Salvador because of the likelihood that he would be harmed if returned there. He has never been charged with or convicted of a crime.</p> <p>On March 12, Abrego Garcia was taken into ICE custody and eventually moved to Texas and, from there, to El Salvador’s notorious Terrorism Confinement Center. The detainees who arrived there from the U.S. were stripped, shackled, and had their heads shaved. No one has heard from Abrego Garcia since he arrived in El Salvador.</p> <p>Lawyers representing Abrego Garcia went to federal court in Maryland, where Abrego Garcia lived with his wife and three children, seeking his return to the United States. The federal government acknowledged that Abrego Garcia should not have been taken to El Salvador, but it countered that Xinis lacked the power to consider Abrego Garcia’s case because (among other things) he was now in El Salvador and because the U.S government lacks any ability to get him back.</p> <p>In a brief ruling on Friday, followed by a longer written decision on Sunday, Xinis instructed the federal government to return Abrego Garcia by 11:59 p.m. on Monday. The government, she stressed, “had no legal authority to arrest him, no justification to detain him, and no grounds to send him to El Salvador—let alone deliver him into one of the most dangerous prisons in the Western Hemisphere.”</p> <p>Xinis declined to put her ruling on hold to give the government time to appeal, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit (in an order that appeared on the docket after the Trump administration submitted its filing to the Supreme Corut) did the same.</p> <p>In <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24A949/354843/20250407103341248_Kristi%20Noem%20application.pdf">his 25-page filing</a>, Sauer contended that “[e]ven amidst a deluge of unlawful injunctions” – apparently referring to other court orders blocking Trump administration policies – “this order is remarkable” because even Abrego Garcia had not asked the federal courts “to force the United States to persuade El Salvador to release” him “on a judicially mandated clock.” The federal government, Sauer maintained, “cannot guarantee success in sensitive international negotiations in advance, least of all when a court imposes an absurdly compressed, mandatory deadline that vastly complicates the give-and-take of foreign-relations negotiations.”</p> <p>Sauer also repeated the government’s contention that Abrego Garcia was a member of the international criminal gang Mara Salvatrucha, commonly known as MS-13, which the United States has designated as a terrorist organization. Abrego Garcia disputes this, and in her written order Xinis noted that “the ‘evidence’ against Abrego Garcia consisted of nothing more than his Chicago Bulls hat and hoodie, and a vague, uncorroborated allegation from a confidential informant claiming he belonged to MS-13’s ‘Western’ clique in New York—a place he has never lived.”</p> <p>Sauer conceded that Abrego Garcia’s “removal to El Salvador was an administrative error.” But that, he continued, does not give district courts the authority to “seize control over foreign relations, treat the Executive Branch as a subordinate diplomat, and demand that the United States let a member of a foreign terrorist organization into America tonight.”</p> <p><em>This article was <a href="https://amylhowe.com/2025/04/07/trump-asks-supreme-court-to-block-order-to-return-wrongly-deported-man-to-u-s/">originally published at Howe on the Court</a>. </em></p> <p>The post <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/04/trump-asks-supreme-court-to-block-order-to-return-wrongly-deported-man-to-u-s/">Trump asks Supreme Court to block order to return wrongly deported man to U.S.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com">SCOTUSblog</a>.</p>

mingooland · · 4 min read
Read more →
Politics

Court adds two cases on Sixth Amendment and retroactive punishment to fall docket

<img src="https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-loaded/v1/CLosXSggRpc_Z69G-AZG1nn9ye8UNv30" border=0 width="1" height="1" alt="Court adds two cases on Sixth Amendment and retroactive punishment to fall docket" title="Court adds two cases on Sixth Amendment and retroactive punishment to fall docket"> <img width="150" height="150" src="https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/supremecourt-5-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Court adds two cases on Sixth Amendment and retroactive punishment to fall docket" title="Court adds two cases on Sixth Amendment and retroactive punishment to fall docket" style="float:right;" decoding="async" srcset="https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/supremecourt-5-150x150.jpg 150w, https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/supremecourt-5-570x570.jpg 570w, https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/supremecourt-5-500x500.jpg 500w, https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/supremecourt-5-1000x1000.jpg 1000w" sizes="(max-width: 150px) 100vw, 150px" /><p><a class="a2a_button_facebook" href="https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/facebook?linkurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scotusblog.com%2F2025%2F04%2Fcourt-adds-two-cases-on-sixth-amendment-and-retroactive-punishment-to-fall-docket%2F&linkname=Court%20adds%20two%20cases%20on%20Sixth%20Amendment%20and%20retroactive%20punishment%20to%20fall%20docket" title="Facebook" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_linkedin" href="https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/linkedin?linkurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scotusblog.com%2F2025%2F04%2Fcourt-adds-two-cases-on-sixth-amendment-and-retroactive-punishment-to-fall-docket%2F&linkname=Court%20adds%20two%20cases%20on%20Sixth%20Amendment%20and%20retroactive%20punishment%20to%20fall%20docket" title="LinkedIn" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_twitter" href="https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/twitter?linkurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scotusblog.com%2F2025%2F04%2Fcourt-adds-two-cases-on-sixth-amendment-and-retroactive-punishment-to-fall-docket%2F&linkname=Court%20adds%20two%20cases%20on%20Sixth%20Amendment%20and%20retroactive%20punishment%20to%20fall%20docket" title="Twitter" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_email" href="https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/email?linkurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scotusblog.com%2F2025%2F04%2Fcourt-adds-two-cases-on-sixth-amendment-and-retroactive-punishment-to-fall-docket%2F&linkname=Court%20adds%20two%20cases%20on%20Sixth%20Amendment%20and%20retroactive%20punishment%20to%20fall%20docket" title="Email" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_printfriendly" href="https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/printfriendly?linkurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scotusblog.com%2F2025%2F04%2Fcourt-adds-two-cases-on-sixth-amendment-and-retroactive-punishment-to-fall-docket%2F&linkname=Court%20adds%20two%20cases%20on%20Sixth%20Amendment%20and%20retroactive%20punishment%20to%20fall%20docket" title="PrintFriendly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_no_icon addtoany_share_save addtoany_share" href="https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scotusblog.com%2F2025%2F04%2Fcourt-adds-two-cases-on-sixth-amendment-and-retroactive-punishment-to-fall-docket%2F&title=Court%20adds%20two%20cases%20on%20Sixth%20Amendment%20and%20retroactive%20punishment%20to%20fall%20docket" data-a2a-url="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/04/court-adds-two-cases-on-sixth-amendment-and-retroactive-punishment-to-fall-docket/" data-a2a-title="Court adds two cases on Sixth Amendment and retroactive punishment to fall docket">Share</a></p><p>The Supreme Court on Monday morning added two new cases, involving the Sixth Amendment right to counsel and restitution orders, to its docket for the 2025-26 term. The announcement came as part of a <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/040725zor_2dp3.pdf">list of orders</a> from the justices’ private conference on Friday, April 4.</p> <p>The court did not act on several requests for emergency relief, including in cases involving President Donald Trump’s effort to end birthright citizenship and his administration’s use of the 18th-century Alien Enemies Act, that are also pending at the court. Orders in those cases could still come at any time.</p> <p>The Constitution’s ex post facto clause prohibits laws that retroactively increase the punishment for a crime or criminalize conduct that was legal when it occurred. The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to decide whether a restitution order, imposed as part of a criminal sentence, is the kind of “punishment” that can violate the clause.<span id="more-319502"></span></p> <p>The question came to the court in two separate cases. The justices agreed to hear <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/ellingburg-v-united-states/">the case of Holsey Ellingburg</a>, who was sentenced to nearly 27 years in prison and ordered to pay restitution for his role in a bank robbery in Georgia. Under the federal laws in effect when he committed the crime, he was required to make his restitution payments for 20 years, until 2016. During that time, he paid approximately $2,000.</p> <p>In 1996, Congress enacted a new law that extends defendants’ liability until the later of two dates: 20 years after the judgment is entered against them or when they are released from prison. The law also requires defendants to pay interest on the restitution.</p> <p>After 2016, the government continued to try to collect restitution from Ellingburg – including after he was released from prison. Ellingburg went to court, arguing that he should not have had to pay restitution after November 2016 and that the 1996 law violated the Constitution.</p> <p>The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit rejected his argument, ruling that restitution is a civil remedy. Ellingburg came to the Supreme Court in October, asking the justices to take up his case. After considering his case at five consecutive conferences, they granted his petition for review on Monday.</p> <p>The justices did not take up <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/neilly-v-michigan/">the case of William Neilly</a>, who had also asked the justices to weigh in on a similar question. Neilly’s petition for review will presumably be put on hold until the justices rule sometime next year on Ellingburg’s case.</p> <p>Nearly a half-century ago, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that a trial court infringed on a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to be represented by an attorney when it prohibited him from meeting with his lawyer during an overnight break in his testimony. The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to decide a related question – whether a court can allow a defendant and his lawyer to meet, but nonetheless ban them from discussing his testimony.</p> <p>The question comes to the court <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/villarreal-v-texas/">in the case of David Villareal</a>, who was convicted and sentenced to 60 years in prison for the stabbing death of his boyfriend, Aaron Estrada. Villareal insisted that he was only acting in self-defense.</p> <p>Villareal came to the Supreme Court in November, telling the justices that the lower courts are divided over whether such a bar is constitutional.</p> <p>Texas acknowledged that the lower courts have reached different conclusions regarding the propriety of such orders. But they are “so rarely issued that” the Supreme Court does not need to weigh in, the state insisted. And in any event, the state added, such orders are “compatible with the Sixth Amendment’s original meaning.”</p> <p>After considering the case at two consecutive conferences, the Supreme Court granted Villareal’s petition for review.</p> <p>The justices also turned down, without comment or relisting it for consideration at a second conference, a request to weigh in now on the constitutionality of the concealed-carry licensing scheme that New York enacted in the wake of the court’s 2022 decision in <em><a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/new-york-state-rifle-pistol-association-inc-v-bruen/">New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen</a></em>, which struck down the law then in effect.</p> <p>As the case came to the court, it hinged in particular on what time period courts should look at to determine the original meaning of the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms and the law’s requirement that an applicant have “good moral character.” New York officials had stressed that the ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit allowing the state to enforce most of the law was only a preliminary one “and may change” as the litigation continues.</p> <p>The court once again did not act on several high-profile petitions for review that have been pending for several weeks, including challenges to <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/ocean-state-tactical-llc-v-rhode-island/">Rhode Island’s ban on large-capacity magazines</a> and <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/snope-v-brown/">Maryland’s ban on military-style assault rifles</a>, as well as a <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/apache-stronghold-v-united-states/">challenge to the transfer to a mining company of federal land in Arizona</a> that the San Carlos Apache Tribe says would destroy specific religious rituals at the site forever. </p> <p><em>This article was <a href="https://amylhowe.com/2025/04/07/court-adds-two-cases-on-sixth-amendment-and-retroactive-punishment-for-the-fall/">originally published at Howe on the Court</a>. </em></p> <p>The post <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/04/court-adds-two-cases-on-sixth-amendment-and-retroactive-punishment-to-fall-docket/">Court adds two cases on Sixth Amendment and retroactive punishment to fall docket</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com">SCOTUSblog</a>.</p>

mingooland · · 5 min read
Read more →
Politics

The morning read for Monday, April 7

<img src="https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-loaded/v1/HyeErxe577Lep04qHVv5Pnn9ye8UNv30" border=0 width="1" height="1" alt="The morning read for Monday, April 7" title="The morning read for Monday, April 7"> <img width="150" height="150" src="https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Banner200115r-1-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="The morning read for Monday, April 7" title="The morning read for Monday, April 7" style="float:right;" decoding="async" /><p><a class="a2a_button_facebook" href="https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/facebook?linkurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scotusblog.com%2F2025%2F04%2Fthe-morning-read-for-monday-april-7%2F&linkname=The%20morning%20read%20for%20Monday%2C%20April%207" title="Facebook" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_linkedin" href="https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/linkedin?linkurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scotusblog.com%2F2025%2F04%2Fthe-morning-read-for-monday-april-7%2F&linkname=The%20morning%20read%20for%20Monday%2C%20April%207" title="LinkedIn" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_twitter" href="https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/twitter?linkurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scotusblog.com%2F2025%2F04%2Fthe-morning-read-for-monday-april-7%2F&linkname=The%20morning%20read%20for%20Monday%2C%20April%207" title="Twitter" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_email" href="https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/email?linkurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scotusblog.com%2F2025%2F04%2Fthe-morning-read-for-monday-april-7%2F&linkname=The%20morning%20read%20for%20Monday%2C%20April%207" title="Email" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_printfriendly" href="https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/printfriendly?linkurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scotusblog.com%2F2025%2F04%2Fthe-morning-read-for-monday-april-7%2F&linkname=The%20morning%20read%20for%20Monday%2C%20April%207" title="PrintFriendly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_no_icon addtoany_share_save addtoany_share" href="https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scotusblog.com%2F2025%2F04%2Fthe-morning-read-for-monday-april-7%2F&title=The%20morning%20read%20for%20Monday%2C%20April%207" data-a2a-url="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/04/the-morning-read-for-monday-april-7/" data-a2a-title="The morning read for Monday, April 7">Share</a></p><p>Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Monday morning read:</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-rejects-challenge-new-york-gun-law-rcna199373">Supreme Court rejects challenge to New York gun law</a> (Lawrence Hurley, NBC News)</li> <li><a href="https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5235598-trump-firings-court-ruling/">Appeals court halts Trump independent agency firings, spurring Supreme Court battle</a> (Zach Schonfeld & Ella Lee, The Hill)</li> <li><a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/us/judges-stymie-trump-with-nationwide-orders-pressure-builds-us-supreme-court-2025-04-06/">As judges stymie Trump with nationwide orders, pressure builds on US Supreme Court</a> (Andrew Chung, Reuters)</li> <li><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/07/us/politics/courts-guns-teenagers.html">A Split on the Right Over Whether Teenagers Can Have Guns</a> (Adam Liptak, The New York Times)</li> <li><a href="https://www.newsweek.com/president-donald-trump-federal-funding-freeze-rhode-island-new-york-letitia-james-supreme-court-2056175">Trump Administration Touts Supreme Court Victory in Funding Cut Dispute</a> (Sean O’Driscoll, Newsweek)</li> </ul> <div class="post_content_holder"> <div class="post_text"> </div> </div> <div class="post_category"> </div> <p>The post <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/04/the-morning-read-for-monday-april-7/">The morning read for Monday, April 7</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com">SCOTUSblog</a>.</p>

mingooland · · 1 min read
Read more →
General

Chisom Gbali: It Is Unconstitutional For Rivers Administrator To Present Fresh 2025 Appropriation Bill

<p>Suspended Rivers Youth Development Commissioner Gbali says Rivers administrator lacks constitutional authority to present the 2025 budget or cancel projects.</p> <p>The post <a href="https://www.arise.tv/chisom-gbali-it-is-unconstitutional-for-rivers-administrator-to-present-fresh-2025-appropriation-bill/">Chisom Gbali: It Is Unconstitutional For Rivers Administrator To Present Fresh 2025 Appropriation Bill</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.arise.tv">Arise News</a>.</p>

mingooland · · 2 min read
Read more →
Politics

CDU und CSU: Eine toxische Geschwisterliebe

Listen on Spotify Apple Music Amazon Music – Schwarz-rote Koalitionsverhandlungen:Warum Merz und Linnemans Problem nicht die SPD und Klingbeil sind, sondern die CSU und Söder. …

mingooland · · 2 min read
Read more →